01-04-2022, 08:18 PM
So here is the question. Do four valid points of circumstantial evidence serve to identify something that cannot be seen?
First, it is hexagonal. Second, it is VMs C-14 contemporary as of 1405. Third, it has a Burgundian connection to the Golden Fleece. Among other Burgundian connections. And fourth, it connects to Dijon and with La Sainte Hostie de Dijon. Pairied and validated, historical connections to Dijon, capital of the Burgundian state through the C-14 dates. It's common history that ties them together.
Is it enough?
First, it is hexagonal. Second, it is VMs C-14 contemporary as of 1405. Third, it has a Burgundian connection to the Golden Fleece. Among other Burgundian connections. And fourth, it connects to Dijon and with La Sainte Hostie de Dijon. Pairied and validated, historical connections to Dijon, capital of the Burgundian state through the C-14 dates. It's common history that ties them together.
Is it enough?