New Blog post: "Mysterious Steganography"- a Damning Observation

[nablator]

I would, personally, suggest that although your argument is logical

Although the argument may seem logical, it is entirely fallacious. It is not even a rational argument.

The flaw (false dichotomy) is to assume that only a fake would use an alphabet that never gets identified within a corpus of existing texts (whose probability of getting discovered increases with the passage of time) despite the well known fact that all writings using a made-up alphabet that is never reused in other documents (as is often the case with ciphers) also share this property.