New Blog post: "Mysterious Steganography"- a Damning Observation

[ReneZ]

I had no idea until now that there were those who didn't accept that the Voynich was the work being discussed in these letters,

For me, everyone is entitled to have his or her own opinion, and I won't make it my mission (anymore) to convince anyone of anything.

For the above question, the divider is likely to be whether one believes that the 1665 Marci letter is genuine, or a fake. If it is genuine (for which there is excellent evidence), then the other letters are strongly linked to the Voynich MS. If it were a fake, then this link does not necessarily exist.