To what extent should the translation respect the grammar?

[Torsten]

Marco, unfortunately I do not have a list of words in the manuscript by frequency.

A concordance for the VMS is available here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

The differences between the scribes (and even between the quires) are why it's best to study individual quires separately.

I have studied what all quires have in common. One result was that all word types in the VMS belong to a single network:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The existence of a single network allows the conclusion that the whole Voynich text is the result of a single system.

"It seems that the existence of a single network for all word types in the VMS would contradict Currier's observation that it is possible to clearly distinguish between two different languages, A and B. ... Now, reordering the sections with respect to the frequency of token <chedy> replaces the seemingly irregular mixture of two separate languages by the gradual evolution of a single system from 'state A' to 'state B'." [Timm & Schinner 2019, p. 6] This result indicates a 'continuous evolution' from 'state A' to 'state B', rather than the existence of two clearly distinguishable languages.