[Article] Orlov YN - Language recognition methods and Voynich Manuscript analysis

[nablator]

Overall these 4 independent statistics indicating that the interpretation of the VMS as a composite manuscript is quite admissible.
 - 'composite' here means (i think) the VMS text has no vowels and uses 2 (or maybe more) different languages.

Thanks for the summary. Admissible assumptions in a way, maybe, but insufficient to explain the paradoxical nature of Voynichese: a case of "ex falso quodlibet".
- About the abjad hypothesis see: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
- About languages/dialects: there are many glaring statistical inconsistencies that don't fall neatly in 2, 3 or 4 categories, and yet the text looks mostly homogeneous to the naked eye over large parts.