10-01-2016, 03:32 PM
This opens up new possibilities to your solution space:
- Divine or sacred language
- Constructed language that tries to emulate or get as close as possible to the "first language" of god
Why then not consider "Chhokey", the sacred language of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) .. does sound familiar.
Surely the Voynich should mostly be an account of Garden Eden, The Golden Aera, then..
Sometimes I find it hard to think about the text as a "whole body". Different scribes, hands, use of (alphabet, abjad, cipher,etc) and sometimes very differing appearance of form. My guess is that different solution spaces would be necessary for certain parts of the text. These differing parts are well documented.
I understand that you stop when touching voynich-non-mainstream. This goes a little OT here, but just to clarify my motivation, I am not a believer or follower of any theories, be they mainstream or not. In this case my motto (which I nicked from someone working in a much more difficult field) is: "I don't believe in anything, but I will take a look at everything". I hope the meaning comes through in english..
I'll try to outline why I mentioned Giuseppe Peano in a different post.
- Divine or sacred language
- Constructed language that tries to emulate or get as close as possible to the "first language" of god
Why then not consider "Chhokey", the sacred language of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) .. does sound familiar.
Surely the Voynich should mostly be an account of Garden Eden, The Golden Aera, then..
Sometimes I find it hard to think about the text as a "whole body". Different scribes, hands, use of (alphabet, abjad, cipher,etc) and sometimes very differing appearance of form. My guess is that different solution spaces would be necessary for certain parts of the text. These differing parts are well documented.
I understand that you stop when touching voynich-non-mainstream. This goes a little OT here, but just to clarify my motivation, I am not a believer or follower of any theories, be they mainstream or not. In this case my motto (which I nicked from someone working in a much more difficult field) is: "I don't believe in anything, but I will take a look at everything". I hope the meaning comes through in english..
I'll try to outline why I mentioned Giuseppe Peano in a different post.