Sequential word repetitions in the VMS

[cvetkakocj@rogers.com]

Hi, Ahmet,

arguing whether the VM has prefixes or not, or whether prefixes can be written separately or together will not give your theory more credibility. Look at the VM text and suggest your explanation for the grammatical pattern that linguists, non-linguists, and even computers, can recognize as prefixes. You can replace  VM glyphs with any letters you want, EVA, ATA or whatever, the pattern is still the same. It is not related to the pictures, but to the grammatical structure of the language.
You cannot claim to solve the VM language if you have no explanation for this grammatical pattern. Explaining this is essential because of the large number of pre-fixed words. If you don't believe this pattern is created by prefixes, you can offer your explanation. 
I have collected some of the VM words and the number of their occurrences that clearly show the pattern of prefixes EVA o-, and qo-. This pattern has been recognized by many VM researchers as a proof of the existence of prefixes. If you think thy are not prefixes, let us know your explanation. By the way, it was your son who claimed in the second video that Turkish language has no prefixes. 
If you are asking for cooperation, I would be more than willing to offer you my explanation and translation of all the words on the list, if you can do the same. It would be interesting to compare.

Sincerely,

Cvetka