06-03-2023, 02:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2023, 04:03 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
(06-03-2023, 02:09 AM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@Ahmet Ardıç
OK. I try to explain with many examples. Examples with words in the original and the translation.
I think most of it is easy to understand. The applications are also similar everywhere.
They write that they don't understand it. OK.
I have given enough examples, I just don't repeat them every time.
By way of repetition:
"g" as abbreviation of unus/unum
"g" is a number word = one = latin = unus/unum
As an ending it stands for singular.
As a prefix it stands for "one" the opposite of "ex" which is also a prefix.
It can also stand alone, but then I have to write it out, otherwise the translator won't understand it.
Examples of use for "unum" test by lat.- engl. self.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
In combination "8" = de or also d'. This also applies to Latin, French, Alemannic and with di-o-de also in Italian.
You can use it, turn it, upside down, individually or in groups. It always works.
The nice thing about it is that it is not a real encryption, but it is a good application.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
Dear Tentakulus,
I have carefully read what you wrote. These may be claims, thoughts, assumptions, but they are not evidence or do not provide evidence. Here is the problem. There are many people who constantly make claims about the VM texts that they cannot read.
However, at the end of the day, don't you think of presenting them to the linguists of the language you are claiming about VM by reading what you say in many sentences in VM with together doing some full-page of readings? When you do this, they will not want to see anagram readings but they will interest only realistic readings (which will be stripped of personal considerations) covered in linguistic evidence only.
Regards,