17-07-2023, 03:54 PM
It is simply that there is no "musmel". "melmus" would be possible. Either one reads it as "muss mel", in which case it would also be correct. Anything goes, except "musmel".
In your example, he also writes "holdernmus" and not "musholder".
But since there has been a change and the "m" is now under the "d", this is unnecessary.
If the professor had written at the time that it was not a "d" but a messed-up "k", everyone would say today that it means "ken muskel", not a muscle, and everyone would be happy.
But that would also be wrong.
In your example, he also writes "holdernmus" and not "musholder".
But since there has been a change and the "m" is now under the "d", this is unnecessary.
If the professor had written at the time that it was not a "d" but a messed-up "k", everyone would say today that it means "ken muskel", not a muscle, and everyone would be happy.
But that would also be wrong.