I'm deep into handwriting right now, and I can tell two things:
* every word on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is written in the same style. It might be done by the same person, but there are certainly irregularities, so this is hard to tell.
* it is very unlikely that this was written after the 15th century
Even if there weren't any other recipe-related phrases on the page, I'd still call it a 50/50 between random ingredient or random expletive (reasons could be thought up for both, the fact remains that we have so little context). With the addition of "so nim", a typical recipe instruction, and a drawing of a goat (?) on the same page, I'd still say the likelihood of "ingredient" is greater.
But like I said, we'd be able to talk about this more informedly if the usage of word-final [x] in 15th century German were investigated.
* every word on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is written in the same style. It might be done by the same person, but there are certainly irregularities, so this is hard to tell.
* it is very unlikely that this was written after the 15th century
Even if there weren't any other recipe-related phrases on the page, I'd still call it a 50/50 between random ingredient or random expletive (reasons could be thought up for both, the fact remains that we have so little context). With the addition of "so nim", a typical recipe instruction, and a drawing of a goat (?) on the same page, I'd still say the likelihood of "ingredient" is greater.
But like I said, we'd be able to talk about this more informedly if the usage of word-final [x] in 15th century German were investigated.