01-08-2023, 11:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-08-2023, 11:51 PM by Emma May Smith.)
The Voynich sections are very short and light on details. The only things of interest I could find (and which I'm not sure I've heard about before) are the following:
1. Edith Rickert was interested in the Voynich Manuscript! I don't why I find this strange, but it's odd to think that when not discussing Chaucer Manly and Rickert were discussing the Voynich Manuscript. I guess this is a well-known fact, but I seem to have glossed over it.
2. That the Second Study Group created a 692-page "Keyword in Context" cross-reference. I wonder if that was saved and whether they wrote any notes on it?
1. Edith Rickert was interested in the Voynich Manuscript! I don't why I find this strange, but it's odd to think that when not discussing Chaucer Manly and Rickert were discussing the Voynich Manuscript. I guess this is a well-known fact, but I seem to have glossed over it.
2. That the Second Study Group created a 692-page "Keyword in Context" cross-reference. I wonder if that was saved and whether they wrote any notes on it?