10-09-2016, 05:11 PM
(10-09-2016, 04:58 PM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Very well-written answer, Emma- You are right, I can't prove that any of these words are related semantically or morphologically. Maybe they are not.
By the by, I do personally think that initial [q] and final [l] are likely to be morphological markers. I just can't prove it. I don't think we're at the point where we can understand the text and underlying language well enough.