17-04-2024, 05:53 PM
The question was just for my interest, has nothing to do with your theory. I just wanted to know which opinion you tend to hold.
From my point of view, as I understand it from my work, there is a meaningful text behind it.
The starting point was to determine whether there are basic structures. These exist and also point to the language. I haven't written about this yet, but I will.
Then there is the analysis of the symbols. If there is a high similarity to 3 other symbols without any effort, there is a high probability that there must be more.
I have already written about "twins". Nothing happens from all writers at the same time just like that.
Ergo, yes, there is more to it.
From my point of view, as I understand it from my work, there is a meaningful text behind it.
The starting point was to determine whether there are basic structures. These exist and also point to the language. I haven't written about this yet, but I will.
Then there is the analysis of the symbols. If there is a high similarity to 3 other symbols without any effort, there is a high probability that there must be more.
I have already written about "twins". Nothing happens from all writers at the same time just like that.
Ergo, yes, there is more to it.