[split] BessAgritianin's reading of 116v

[BessAgritianin]

This is like Plato's Republic book 7 with the men in cave... If you tell them something about the real world, they not believe you.

Almost all solvers say something like this.  They all provide us with isolated word translations, or sentences that don't make sense in either the target language or English, using systems that are so flexible one can and does produce anything out of them.  Despite this, it's never their system that is at fault; it's often our fault for refusing to accept it.   

My translation is full and understandable. It proves a lot of facts, if you do not sit in the cave, explained in Plato book 7.
And let me be more explicable:
1.The Manuscript is not a hoax.
2. It is a highly interesting medicinal work.
3. The user of the manuscript and the author are different persons, since the user has written a lot of explanatory notes. Here comes also the thought that the user has copied the book without understanding from the original, which we don't have. 
4. The last page (f116v) is in old Moravian and German languages. Be very careful here I am speaking about the last page. The other pages may content another languages too. 
5. Is the user of the Manuscript (defined by me as the one, who wrote the marginalia - all explanatory notes) Jacobus  de Tepence? I think so, but the final word have handwriting comparison experts.
6. It is a recipe for facial treatment by some venereal disease.
7. The user was a highly educated physician or a healer, since his terminology is professional.
8. Some of the very important letters like "8" is not "d" like all here have accepted. This will change all of the cave statistical results. This will help maybe to translate further to some of you.
8. I have some translation from another pages too, but I am not sure if posting them here will contribute to anything, considering your thoughts above.