[split] BessAgritianin's reading of 116v

[BessAgritianin]

Bess, what was your goal in posting on this forum (or elsewhere)? Did you want to be applauded, did you want to receive praise or get help from people who, like you, want to understand the manuscript?
And if you send your paper to a scientific journal, will you cry when you receive the answer? Are you going to call the editors “cave people”?
You must learn, first of all, to distinguish a draft from the final version of your work.
The good news: no theory is completely accepted to date, so yours may be the first.

 Dear Ruby,
I wanted to help with some of mine findings. I had read some of the comments in this blog concerning You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and decided to add my contribution.
The truth is, that the more you understand from the manuscript, the more questions arise. As I stated before I have translations of the real foils of the manuscript, but  there I feel more confused and I really need help to be able to finish them. If you ask me why I will tell you. Either by purpose, or by copying unknown text, the writer of the manuscript has used:
1. Seemingly one symbol for different sounds, or different Latin letters. Example "aron" For "r" and "n" one symbol.
2. Two symbols for one Latin letter.
Therefore now statistics will never be true. The statistical study should consider combinations of possibilities.
"Cave" should not be considered offensive- rather like a community of researchers who have built a certain system of understandings, and any new eye who sees it differently is an enemy.
  Well I didn't expect applauses, but expected answers- correction of the wrong places- for example "abre" is not this plant but it is ....(whatever). For example I expected answers like ReneZ provides. 
BR