f17r multispectral images

[pfeaster]

This is a good observation by itself - that part of the marginalia act kind of Voynichese-like. However, is this also true for the parts most closely mixed with Voynichese? E.g. on f116v, the problematic part you point out is a separate section: a prayer or charm or spell or whatever, with crosses on each end and between the words. Latin language plus "spell language". But then on the next line is Voynichese with German language from recipe books ("in that case, take goat's milk").

I'll admit that the "charm" segment looks more obviously patterned than other passages do.  But there could be a few vaguely Voynichese-like patterns that apply throughout -- at least, as much as it's possible to tell from such a small sample of text overall, and with such uncertainty about so many of the individual letters.  

• The glyph that looks like [8] or EVA [d] is always word-final (including what could be [mu8] on f66r) except for [pal8cn] (or whatever).  
  
• The glyph that looks like a Latin [x] is always word-final and preceded by [i], except for [poxlcbor] (or whatever).
  
• The two exceptions [pal8cn] and [poxlcbor] both involve words that otherwise begin [pal] or [pol], so they too follow a pattern of sorts.  
  
• The glyph that looks like something like [u] is always either word-initial (e.g. ubren) or the second letter of a word (e.g. lucz) -- never later.
  
• The glyph that looks like [c] often has a horizontal line extending forward from it to form ligature-like structures a bit like we see in Voynichese.