[Article] "The Voynich Manuscript was written in a single, natural language"

[Rafal]

It's good for him that he doesn't start from the scratch like many others (and claims that everything before him was rubbish) but uses existing data as a start.

My feeling is however that he quotes others but doesn't make much new, interesting observation himself.
All this stuff like Zipf's law was done to death before and while it is a valid observation, it doesn't give you right to claim that the text is meaningful or it is a natural language (and not a constructed language for example).