24-11-2024, 11:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 24-11-2024, 11:42 AM by Mark Knowles.)
I would like to think of myself as an imaginative person. However, I don't think that I possess enough imagination of the details to come up with an explanation that would fit any theory in a way that I could find credible.
I am quite happy to piggyback on other people's ideas. I was not the first person to suggest the page was a map. And I borrowed from Nick Pelling's theory in quite a few respects.
In many ways I have sought out an explanation that challenges my imagination as little as possible. I think a "map" interpretation of the page makes it easier to explain many of the details without having to strain one's imagination too much.
I am quite happy to piggyback on other people's ideas. I was not the first person to suggest the page was a map. And I borrowed from Nick Pelling's theory in quite a few respects.
In many ways I have sought out an explanation that challenges my imagination as little as possible. I think a "map" interpretation of the page makes it easier to explain many of the details without having to strain one's imagination too much.