Can VM be written in vowelless Latin?

[farmerjohn]

I had a short look at Yulia May's key, and found only one word for which we have the same translation: oty - omnis. That's not very much...

Hello, farmerjohn!
Actually, oty in my interpretation has a few alternates for now, one of them is "opem" and can be omnem, labem, libum, limum, lupum, lobum. I also have a big problem with short words, as I get too many alternates from them. I suppose they may differ by some details in characters to divide one variant of an interpretation from another. My most favourite examples are "o"s: some under the line, some - with a bar, open-loop etc.), but it is still in the process.
A common thing in our theories is that we consider it enciphered Latin text, partially abjad with abbreviations, substituted by one or a few glyphs of the cipher, in particular, y (at a beginning) - com, cum, con... r - r* are also in my key.

Hello, Searcher.
Ambiguity is certainly the most unpleasant problem for key like ours. It makes them unfalsifiable - nightmare for real scientist
For your solution I strongly suggest to calculate Latin letter frequencies via your key (which I did via my) and in particular to calculate first letter frequency (which I didn't).
These calculations allowed me to understand that t stands for two m/n's and l also is m/n and sh is pr. I also saw that q is q/k and x is z is absolutely acceptable.
And as an amateur with nanoknowledge in this area I don't have right to suggest something to anybody. But if I had , I would advise every Searcher and Researcher to consider possibility that o is u/v/b and pronounced like [w]. This immediately yields that q is q. Then it follows that qo- is aqua- and with no effort at all we got theory explaining why some qo- words are often in Lang B, but not in Lang A.