The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $can_link - Line: 6 - File: showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1658 eval



The Voynich Ninja › Voynich Research › Analysis of the text v
Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence?

Thread modes
Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence?
ThomasCoon Offline
Scriba Praeplatypus
****
Posts: 366Threads: 17
Member details
Posts: 366
Threads: 17
Thanks Received: 89 in 60 posts
Thanks Given: 335
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation: 3
Location: United States
Country: United States
#6
23-09-2016, 02:33 PM (This post was last modified: 23-09-2016, 03:10 PM by ThomasCoon. Edit Reason: wrong date for D'Imperio )
Mary D'Imperio gave this chart at the end of her 1978 work:

[Image: attachment.php?aid=650]

I've often wondered if the things that Job mentioned appear in the manuscript: maybe [in] = "um" and [iin] = "unt", so that the result is Latin. But this is only a passing idea - nothing that I have researched Smile


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence? - by -Job- - 19-02-2016, 05:31 AM
RE: Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence? - by -Job- - 20-02-2016, 04:14 AM
RE: Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence? - by ThomasCoon - 23-09-2016, 02:33 PM
RE: Proof for [i] and [n] equivalence? - by -JKP- - 23-09-2016, 06:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)