That’s very much more understandable.
Poxleber in 116v line 1 is quite readable and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The page contains the illustration of a quadruped. I don’t see how that reading could be wrong.
Another very solid one is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The parallel with the Vicenza ms is convincing.
I also think that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are right about “So nim geismi[l]ch”, in 116v line 4. In particular, “so nim” is very frequent You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
The Latin text in 116v lines 2 and 3 is also largely readable, but it appears to be a charm mostly made of meaningless words (as often was the case): this makes it impossible to validate character shapes by referencing possible meanings.
In general, it’s true that some of the characters are ambiguous: that is often the case with medieval scripts; the additional problem is that we have little context and the meaning of much of the marginal text is unclear, therefore ambiguities cannot be solved.
EDIT: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. compares transcriptions of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by four different researchers.
Poxleber in 116v line 1 is quite readable and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The page contains the illustration of a quadruped. I don’t see how that reading could be wrong.
Another very solid one is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The parallel with the Vicenza ms is convincing.
I also think that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are right about “So nim geismi[l]ch”, in 116v line 4. In particular, “so nim” is very frequent You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
The Latin text in 116v lines 2 and 3 is also largely readable, but it appears to be a charm mostly made of meaningless words (as often was the case): this makes it impossible to validate character shapes by referencing possible meanings.
In general, it’s true that some of the characters are ambiguous: that is often the case with medieval scripts; the additional problem is that we have little context and the meaning of much of the marginal text is unclear, therefore ambiguities cannot be solved.
EDIT: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. compares transcriptions of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by four different researchers.