02-02-2025, 10:27 AM
I'm certainly not the person to argue for or against specific readings of medieval German or Latin, my point was just that we don't have enough unambiguous transcriptions of marginalia to reliable tell which subset of Latin characters is used.
Maybe you are right. But I won't be surprised either, if this is not poxleber. Maybe I'm mistaken, but all the readings we have as of now are of "this is plausible, given there is no better explanation" kind. I'm not aware of a single reading that would successfully produce a meaningful and grammatically sound phrase.
(02-02-2025, 09:57 AM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Poxleber in 116v line 1 is quite readable and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The page contains the illustration of a quadruped. I don’t see how that reading could be wrong.
Maybe you are right. But I won't be surprised either, if this is not poxleber. Maybe I'm mistaken, but all the readings we have as of now are of "this is plausible, given there is no better explanation" kind. I'm not aware of a single reading that would successfully produce a meaningful and grammatically sound phrase.