Another possible investigation is to try and find out if a specific set of evolution rules could be responsible for Massimiliano Zattera's slot sequence, or a similar (simplified) one, and generate this set to maximize their probability from a VM transliteration, instead of just guessing them.
For example, in the other thread:
This is an interesting one. It appears (as a word) only once in f66r, 15 times in Q20.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I wonder which evolution rule could have caused its late appearance, or if a new rule was added for Q20.
An evolution rule like "ey." → "eo." is unlikely, it would probably have produced "cheeo" from "cheey" earlier.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (176 instances)
For example, in the other thread:
(02-07-2025, 01:05 AM)Bluetoes101 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You end up running into "cheeo" however, which is fairly common.
This is an interesting one. It appears (as a word) only once in f66r, 15 times in Q20.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I wonder which evolution rule could have caused its late appearance, or if a new rule was added for Q20.
An evolution rule like "ey." → "eo." is unlikely, it would probably have produced "cheeo" from "cheey" earlier.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (176 instances)