About this Subforum

[Michael Obraztsov]

The neural network told me that there was a person who translated the EVA encoding "qokedy" like me - "to fle sa". This is Derek Vogt. He didn't take into account only some nuances so that his recognizable 20% of the text turned into 100%, like mine. I want to express my great respect to him, and it would be interesting for me to talk to him. 

As for the neural network's response, it is possible that its answer was inaccurate, and Derek Vogt did not translate EVA "dy" as "sa".

So, what are we still talking about?

Hello.
Yesterday I was unable to respond due to internet issues.
I posted this article primarily as a confirmation that I am ready to recognize other people as co-authors if they have done something similar, and in this case I am not going to assume the status of the sole discoverer. But the less overlap there is with the results of other studies, the more unique my work becomes. I think my motives in this are quite obvious.
On the other hand, your motives are not entirely clear to me. I wrote that my cipher is suitable for 100% of the text of the Voynich manuscript. You didn't ask for confirmation, but simply replied with the phrase "what is there to discuss here?" May I know the reasons for your attitude? Are you not interested in deciphering the Voynich manuscript? Or do you meet people every day who claim to have completely deciphered this manuscript? Maybe you meet people like that every week, every month, or at least every year?

I have translated the top half of this (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) page into a fully coherent, meaningful text. Earlier, I partially translated the lower part of this page, but I did not translate it fully coherently, and I did not write down everything that was translated.
I will post the entire translation of the already translated fragment only when I have translated the lower half of the page, but you can choose any sentence from there (there are 5 sentences), and I will immediately give you its translation, with detailed explanations. I do not recommend reading the first sentence, because there are too many proper names (expressed through allegories), but you still will not be able to uniquely identify plants by comparing the names from the manuscript with modern names.