Need advice for testing of hypotheses related to the self-citation method

[ReneZ]

satisfied with an explanation of why "the whole thing cannot work" (dixit ReneZ).

Very brief:

The high level of repetitions is not the most conspicuous artifact of the text. Perhaps not even the second most conspicuous, but probably the third. This is so subjective that I don't want to argue about it.

Using this as the prime method for the text generation, while it does nothing towards the most conspicuous aspects (low entropy, word pattern - same thing really) is my biggest problem.

But this risks getting us off topic.