Big red stain on f103r and retouching of text

[magnesium]

To reinforce Dr. Davis's point about the later retouching, only some of the glyphs within the stain are copied down. In fact, there are some glyphs within the stain that are not consistently reflected in current VMS transliterations. Here's an enhanced view of the stain:



Referencing You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., with the stain text in bold:

<f103r.1,@P0>    pchedal.shdy.yteechypchy.otey.ylshey.qoteey.qotal.shedy.yshdal.dain.okol.dal.dy
<f103r.2,+P0>    dain.shek.chcphhdy.daloky.opchedy.peshol.chep.ar.otchy.sal.lkeey.sar.ain.ok.chedy
<f103r.3,+P0>    yshdain.sheek.cheoty.chokal.chedy.chckhy.or.orol.okain.chal.ot.kar.ot.chym
<f103r.4,+P0>    ychedy.qokedy.okedy.qokeey.okey.chdarol.loty.chedar.aly
<f103r.5,+P0>    pocharal.okedar.shedy.oteey.qokey.lkar.sheeky.okalor.shedy.rkar.otan.okdy
<f103r.6,+P0>    ocheey.dain.shek.okeedy.okey.shedy.qokealdy.shcthy.qotedy.qot.san.am

There are vestiges of additional glyphs within the stain that the retoucher evidently missed or wasn't confident in filling in after the fact. My additions, bolded and underlined, with brackets denoting unclear additional letters:

<f103r.1,@P0>    pchedal.shdy.yteechypchy.otey.ylshey.qoteey.qotal.shedy.yshdal.dain.okol.dal.dy
<f103r.2,+P0>    dain.shek.chcphhdy.daloky.opchedy.peshol.chep.ar.otchy.sal.lkeey.sar.ain.ok.chedy
<f103r.3,+P0>    yshdain.sheek.cheoty.chokal.chedy.chckhy.or.orol.okain.chal.ot.shkar.ot.chym
<f103r.4,+P0>    ychedy.qokedy.okedy.qokeey.okey.chdarol.loty.chedar.aly
<f103r.5,+P0>    pocharal.okedar.shedy.oteey.qokey.lkar.sheeky.okalor.shedy.yt[?].rkar.otan.okdy
<f103r.6,+P0>    ocheey.dain.shek.okeedy.okey.shedy.qokealdy.shcthy.qotedy.qot.dy.ota[?].san.am

The You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. includes some of these glyphs, but not the full shkar in f103r.3.