Why I think that the copyist(s)/scribe(s) did not fully understand the material

[ReneZ]

Or is the whole problem with the top of 88r just the extra gap between the top left label and the container?

For me, the top row of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is the only clear case, but all of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. might well suffer from the same problem.

There is a lot more going on in the pharmaceutical section that may betray things about the creation of the MS, but inevitably it is all speculative. For me, this means that we can keep it in the back of our mind, but should not give too much weight to it. It can be part of a bigger picture.

Apart from the (probably) misplaced label, the 'unfinished' bifolio is intriguing. Unfinished parts can be seen in other manuscripts too, but it is not very common.
What intrigues me is that this is language A, Hand 1, which is what the MS starts with.

Odd, to say the least, and I think that this could be seen as further evidence of a collaboration project.