Tell me how I am wrong please.

[Rafal]

What is the point of this forum then?

I believe that we are trying Here to discuss Voynich Manuscript in a RATIONAL way.
Your solution is too mystical/esotheric for this forum. It doesn't stand the test of rationality.

I have shown it to Chat GPT and it says:

The passage uses the language of science and mathematics — base-60 math, phi (φ), tau (τ), Fibonacci, eigenpairs, modular closure, etc. — but applies them in a metaphorical or symbolic way rather than in a rigorously defined mathematical sense.
That style (mixing esoteric metaphors with technical-sounding math) is common in:

• pseudoscientific writing, which borrows scientific vocabulary without using its logic,
  
• or mystical “pattern” theories, which try to show that all systems are connected through hidden ratios or symbols.
  

...
In cryptography or linguistics, a valid decipherment must:

• produce consistent results across the entire text,
  
• map one-to-one with verifiable meanings,
  
• and be falsifiable (you can prove it wrong).
  

This theory doesn’t meet those criteria — it’s a symbolic reinterpretation, not a decipherment.