31-10-2025, 06:06 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
If you type in "k" you will see 10845 results, "t" has 6872. If we look at the pairings "lt" and lk" you get the results I showed.
If they were the same you wouldn't expect this.
Why specifically "ch" I don't know, but it would make sense that if we have cXh (X being f,p,k,t) then you would expect two characters (start-end), and so this logic likely applies to the "ch" glyph without the "X".
If you type in "k" you will see 10845 results, "t" has 6872. If we look at the pairings "lt" and lk" you get the results I showed.
If they were the same you wouldn't expect this.
Why specifically "ch" I don't know, but it would make sense that if we have cXh (X being f,p,k,t) then you would expect two characters (start-end), and so this logic likely applies to the "ch" glyph without the "X".