(28-11-2025, 11:57 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If the report says: "possibly minor amounts of lead sulfide and palmierite", and the amateur response is: no, definitely not, then that does not look like a winning argument to me.
What I'm trying to say is that we don't have a scholarly paper on how likely it is to have palmierite in the VM. It's not like professor so and so proclaimed this after weighing all the data and the historical context. There is no assessment of the likelihood of the palmierite scenario, because that's not expected of the report. This is more likely the result of a (manual or automated) comparing of test results to reference data.
What I'm saying is that even if an automated process determined that the reading could point to palmierite, then it should still be in the report and we have to take it for what it is.