23-12-2025, 07:23 PM
(23-12-2025, 12:18 AM)kckluge wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Since the Zodiac pages have an ordering, I plotted the "no labels" coordinates for the 1st two eigenvectors with lines connecting each page to the next one (the last one, Sagittarius, is the point at the bottom at x ~= 0.025):
....
I don't see any coherent trend in that. If I'm counting correctly, the point sticking out to the right at y ~= 0.045 is Leo,
which lines up to some degree with Leo & Sagittarius being peaks in your plot of % EVA "ed" in the non-label circle text, but it's still solidly on the A language side of the gap in the side 3-D view (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
Thank you, Karl, your trajectory plot is quite interesting.
Maybe I am hallucinating and biased, but it seems to me that, if one takes y=x as a quick and dirty approximation of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., the zodiac pages tend to get progressively closer to the gap (finally jumping across with the last sample Sagittarius). Since the first two circular diagrams f70r1/2 have a different format, comparing them with the zodiac proper (from Pisces to Sagittarius) isn’t necessarily significant in this context.
The plot on the right shows Y-X (i.e. PCA2-PCA1) as a measure of “A-ness”, with 0 (PCA2=PCA1) being the hypothetical boundary between A and B.