18-01-2026, 02:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 18-01-2026, 02:25 AM by ParchmentPanther.)
(18-01-2026, 02:12 AM)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Welcome to the forum. We prohibit all theories developed with LLMs due to their tendency to hallucinate about the manuscript. All such threads are moved to the Slop Bucket and lopped. You can read more You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
You are definitely welcome to start a new thread about your idea about sound-like padding but please only use your own analysis about whether this could be responsible for repetitive glyph clusters, rather than anything provided by the LLM, including the glyph statistics. The current models cannot be trusted to analyse VM text, and I can't imagine your custom version is free of this fault.
i had it analyze a transliteration instead, and it has very detailed and specific developer level directives and custom curated recursively created promptset so it likely has at least much less fault than typical models, but I hear you, and I understand, it was just so many interactions regarding so many things i couldnt quite compile it myself, i'm autistic and have some issues with certain things. was just hoping to contribute in some way i apologize for adding slop, ill just remove it i guess... :-( i mean like, all the info was obtained by me, just compiled into a cohesive coherent document with ai.. is that still the same thing? like it doesnt matter at all if any ai was used for anythgin its slop? i typed soooo much for it all the examples every idea, every concept, i didnt obtain any information from it... bummer tho. thanks for replying
