Theory that the final section is a multilingual glossary

[rikforto]

rikforto: even under the Chinese theory? I thought its main (if not the only) strong point is explaining the rigid structure using the way syllables are constructed in monosyllabic languages

Perhaps, but I don't think the two strands play very nicely here. If it is a document for European use, I would expect European glosses as well, not to mention other languages that don't fit the profile of a standard Mainland Southeast Asian language. On the other hand, if those non-MSEA glosses are in Voynichese, that would prove Voynichese is capable of encoding a European language, and undercut the need for the Chinese Theory in the first place.

I can't with full intellectual honesty say neither possibility is conceivable, but they do seem to be stepping on each other's toes, if that makes sense?