15-03-2026, 03:37 PM
The Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript Alphabet would benefit from a more thorough engagement with existing literature and Voynich ninja forum discussions.
Example: Marginalia interpretations of the presentation are not only inaccurate but represent incredibilty.
Previously published explanations are overlooked. For example 17r- the finding that this is the scientifical name of the herb - written in Latin as "malher alber"- mallow is interpreted as "mallier aller". Not speaking about the last sentence of 116v: "So nim jasmich"- interpreted as "gas mich".
Here is my recommendation- for the presentation to be more meaningful contribution to the field, must address the existing state.
Example: Marginalia interpretations of the presentation are not only inaccurate but represent incredibilty.
Previously published explanations are overlooked. For example 17r- the finding that this is the scientifical name of the herb - written in Latin as "malher alber"- mallow is interpreted as "mallier aller". Not speaking about the last sentence of 116v: "So nim jasmich"- interpreted as "gas mich".
Here is my recommendation- for the presentation to be more meaningful contribution to the field, must address the existing state.