Who actually wants the Voynich solved?

[Mark Knowles]

It’s not about the theory. It’s about how it’s presented.
A so-called expert can’t tell you what it is, but he’ll tell you what isn’t possible.
Mark has experienced this with me. For example: If he considers the rosette to be lakes, even though some of them are reservoirs that weren’t built until 1930, I won’t accept that.

You pointed out that two very small and minor lakes in the bottom left hand corner(blink and you could miss seeing them on the rosettes folio) that I highlighted in my theory amongst the very many lakes I pointed to were probably not likely to have been lakes at the time. I didn't argue with that as I thought that inevitably some of the very numerous details that I highlighted in my rosettes were likely to be incorrect and I said as much before you even mentioned those lakes, but I thought it best to come up with the best identification that I could for each detail. In fact, I said here in the forum prior to your comment that it seemed to me almost impossible that every detail that I highlighted was correct.
I think also it is very difficult to know what all the lakes around Lucerne looked like 600 years ago.
However, you seem to think that because you spotted 2 very small discrepancies that you somehow disproved my theory.