01-08-2026, 11:25 PM
1). In fact, I would like to make a more complicated version of this mini-cipher, but I think it should be published separately. I will make it a little later 
2). @oshfdk, next time, your comments like "the cipher is not perfect/there is no statistics/it doesn't look like it/I don't understand anything at all" will be ignored, please.
Specifically, this cipher shows how the VMS text could have been created, demonstrating the intended encryption process, which I believe is not limited to a single algorithm that transforms A into B. I have no intention of making a cipher that just reproduces the VMS text. This is useless to me, because it doesn't prove anything, first of all. Secondly, there is the Naibbe cipher for this purpose.
If you want, play around with the Naibbe cipher at your leisure, get a perfect result, and if you want, never look at this thread. I've already described what I think about Voynichese, and as much as I would like to, your views seem to be completely different from mine.
2). @oshfdk, next time, your comments like "the cipher is not perfect/there is no statistics/it doesn't look like it/I don't understand anything at all" will be ignored, please.
Specifically, this cipher shows how the VMS text could have been created, demonstrating the intended encryption process, which I believe is not limited to a single algorithm that transforms A into B. I have no intention of making a cipher that just reproduces the VMS text. This is useless to me, because it doesn't prove anything, first of all. Secondly, there is the Naibbe cipher for this purpose.
If you want, play around with the Naibbe cipher at your leisure, get a perfect result, and if you want, never look at this thread. I've already described what I think about Voynichese, and as much as I would like to, your views seem to be completely different from mine.