I am not convinced by the provenance history of the VMS

[rikforto]

I acknowledge that as far as "looks like" comparisons go, this one both has a better pedigree and scans better for me than most. On the other hand, the overlaid images are fairly different when you look past the radii. Now, I realize you are likely to insist that I cannot look past the radii, but not only can I, the number of potential source photographs, even in the works you mention, pretty well covers the various configurations of inner and outer circles one might end up with, especially since many in both works are imprecise. I would be much more convinced if other details lined up, such as the number or shape of the chambers on the purported You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. identification or the weight and distribution of the dots in the f85r2 identification.

Now, someone may well have embellished those photographs as they copied them, but that quickly slides into territory where all similarities are in your favor and all differences are just a failure on the part of your critics to see what you see---the perennial problem of the "looks like" theory!