Voynich-like Symbols in a Florentine Manuscript

[nablator]

figure sequens habebit.

Mostly hallucinated AI interpretation as MarcoP said including the easy parts:
"figure participiorum sunt hee"

There is a transcription in a Bollettino della Accademia italiana di stenografia - Page 412 (1935) but Google Books gives only a few excerpts:

Not sure where this is:

... ut unum duo ) cuius casus est per illlud cum quo contrahitur | cognoscitur. In secundo limite denotat ordinem ... tabula huius artis situantur. Unde communis artifex communia imponit vocabula, specialis specialia, ut per huius doctorem videbis manifeste. Pronominum | 12 sunt figure , ut hee : g . h . i . 1. 1. 1. m . n . o . p . q . r .; quarta | vocatur Kipra ( ? ) quinta

This perfectly matches the end:

... synonima ut Marcus Tullius, ensis | gladius mucro que non est necesse ponere omnia. quedam equivoca ut | canis quorum bona est impositio et terminatur per adiuncta ista impositione | sicut facta et scita debet artifex qui vult reportare sermones | et leciones dispones pergamene tabellas duabus lineis

   

Maybe digitized here, there is a PDF for year 1935: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
But there is no page 412... wrong page? wrong year?

Google translates it to:

Know that some nouns are synonyms—for example, *ensis*, *gladius*, and *mucro* [all meaning "sword"]—and it is not necessary to list them all. Others are equivocal—such as *canis* [meaning "dog" or "dog-star"]—where the intended meaning is determined by the context; just as a craftsman who wishes to record discourses and lessons must organize his parchment or tablets by ruling them with two lines.