(05-11-2026, 11:50 PM)npcompl33t wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(05-11-2026, 11:29 PM)eggyk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Is this being done with the newer scans, or the 2004 scans? It would be informative if both sets of scans show consistent results here.
I also used the newer scans, like quimqu. I also checked the values against the multispectral images, which have a decent spread across the MS, and they were extremely close, so I don't think this is an effect of the camera.
The non-msi 2004 scans are significantly higher quality than 2014 because of the different image format. I really recommend using them, especially for PCA image analysis.
Nablator provided me some links You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. when I was trying to find them.
Edit: And the colour scales are completely different, so if the results were to be repeated with the 2004 scans it would make this more convincing as well!