5 hours ago
Very easy to understand, thank you
And very interesting.
If the groups of sheets indeed were damaged by only two incidents (thus creating a set with bottom creasing and one with side creasing), what are we picturing? The only thing I can think of is that a number of leaves, stacked, underwent the same fold as if they were one sheet, so to speak?
I can also imaging that the MS at some point underwent a sideways force that drew a crease in a number of pages, which would lead to only vaguely matching folds, not necessarily in immediately adjacent folios.
If it can be shown to have been one fold that affected a stack of pages at once, then it is established that those were at one point adjacent. If it was more of a general force that made some pages rub against others and create folds, then their location may have been more dispersed.
And very interesting.If the groups of sheets indeed were damaged by only two incidents (thus creating a set with bottom creasing and one with side creasing), what are we picturing? The only thing I can think of is that a number of leaves, stacked, underwent the same fold as if they were one sheet, so to speak?
I can also imaging that the MS at some point underwent a sideways force that drew a crease in a number of pages, which would lead to only vaguely matching folds, not necessarily in immediately adjacent folios.
If it can be shown to have been one fold that affected a stack of pages at once, then it is established that those were at one point adjacent. If it was more of a general force that made some pages rub against others and create folds, then their location may have been more dispersed.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)