RE: VMs Zodiac shows heraldry
R. Sale > 26-01-2016, 10:45 PM
Forum members,
My apologies for the apparent dust-up. It was not intentional on my part. Though I admit I was curious to discover the other person's unbiased opinion - before I went and biased it. In recent conversations, elsewhere, the contradictory position to the proposed heraldic interpretation of the designs on the tubs in initial pages of the VMs Zodiac was that the VMs designs were generic and had no relation to anything. So I was pleased to see that some similarities were found in this discussion.
Here I thought we had identified a common starting point and the discussion of heraldry could continue from there. On the contrary. What was wanted was the whole enchilada yesterday. Yesterday, was only the beginning of the discussion.
The VMs Zodiac shows heraldic influences. That is the initial point I wanted to make. There is no point discussing the interpretations of heraldic influence with someone who steadfastly denies their existence. Been there, done that.
The second point, to test the validity of heraldry, heraldic interpretation should be used as an investigative tool in the VMs illustrations. Will my assertions simply be accepted? Hasn't happened yet.
There is the Petra Sancta situation.
The search for historical correspondence of armorial insignia with any of the VMs illustrations has very few options. They are problematic and for simplicity's sake they are all dead ends.
However, there is a trick. The patterns on White Aries, with the blue and white stripes, are given their descriptions based on a radial orientation within the illustration. The eye just naturally goes to the radial orientation. But the orientation of the blue and white patterns is changed if all radial influences are removed. Both striped patterns now have the orientation of a heraldic bendy. Color and pattern are significant, but it's the pairing that is important. The purpose and extent of pairing in the VMs Zodiac is a significant and relevant topic.
'Bendy, argent et azur' (silver, aka white, and blue) is the blazon for the armorial insignia of the Fieschi family. The family provided two popes to the historical sequence during the 13th century: Innocent IV and Adrian V. History indicates that they were uncle and nephew. History tells us that in 1251 CE, Pope Innocent IV made his nephew a cardinal. History also tells that prior to this, it was Innocent IV who started a tradition in ecclesiastical heraldry when he designated the red galero as a sign of the office of cardinal.
Now look at the White Aries illustration and the two figures involved. The one in the inner ring of figures has head gear that can prospectively be designated as a representation of a red galero. Right away it is clear that the two figures are properly oriented in the celestial spheres in their correct hierarchical positions. It's not accidental. It's an example of intentional, objective, positional confirmation. Out of the set of all possibilities, the placement choice represented in the illustration is the only option that shows a proper, traditional relationship.
Having a specific identification of two historical individuals in the VMs text is also a matter of some significance. The White Aries illustration contains additional confirmations based on the objective description of their positions. Both figures are located in the most favored heraldic quadrant. The central medallion for the investigastion of papal heraldry is White Aries. A white animal is the traditional choice for celestial sacrifice. And popes are traditionally considered to have celestial connections. No other VMs Zodiac illustration offers that same relationship.
There are obvious reasons why White Aries is white. First because the other animals are brown. A second because virtually everything else in the White Aries illustration has been painted. And it is White Aries alone among the Zodiac pages that has been so carefully painted. It is all part of a complex construction contained in the VMs Zodiac illustrations. The complexity of the White Aries illustration can only result from intentional construction.
The fact that historical correspondence in the VMs is found behind a radial illusion in a clear indication that deception has been used. Deception through the ambiguity of interpretation. The positive option still needs to be present. As in the secondary option for the orientation of the blue stripes. Certain trickery has been used to obfuscate illustrations that might otherwise too obviously lead to the historical grounding, as seen from the author's perspective. The illustration is better suited to interpretation by those who would recognize the Fieschi coat of arms, than by those who are clueless to this particular historical tidbit. Medieval and subsequent members of the clergy come to mind. Conveniently, this also overlaps with literacy during the most relevant time.
There is now, for those who have investigated heraldry far enough to discover the definition of papelonny and the presence of the two similar illustrations in VMs Pisces and Dark Aries, a surprising example of positional confirmation. The papelonny patterns have a corresponding placement, in quadrant and in sphere, with the blue striped patterns of White Aries. Heraldry has used the striped patterns as a means of identification for the Fieschi popes. The French word for pope is 'pape'. And the objectively placed, backing patterns are shown to be examples of papelonny. Is that intentionally punny or what?
The author had the knowledge and the ability to create the identities and the placements that are found in the illustrations. Does the reader have the ability to find and understand the author's intentions? The author is a master, and the reader who is unfamiliar with heraldry can not qualify as a beginner in a heraldic investigation.
The contiguous connection of the outer blue striped pattern and the inner example of a patterned marker in the middle band of text on White Aries never did look completely accidental. Now you know why. It isn't. The connection is unique. A pair of these patterned text markers are found on White Aries. [Plus one on Cancer.] The markers designate text. Heraldry validates the markers. Historical grounding verifies the intentional (prospective) use of this construction as a text delivery system. One that is intentionally disguised, but can be recovered through the application of traditional and historical information as this outline demonstrates. The connection with the ecclesiastical tradition of cardinals holds the possibility of recovery open at least as long as the church tradition continues.
That is the purpose of heraldry in the VMs. It opens an investigative pathway for the reader to follow. That pathway leads to specific text segments. Those text segments are in need of further examination. The investigation now passes from images to linguistics. I have some observations, but no theories that hold water. So, in that situation, I would be in need of collaboration, hopefully by someone who understood the workings of the prior investigation.
There is no guarantee the VMs will ever be solved. But, where to look? If the author has built up a complex construction in the manuscript, is it worth discussing?