• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

The Tepenecz signature in book no. 4: a concern

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Provenance & history
  • The Tepenecz signature in book no. 4: a concern
• The Tepenecz signature in book no. 4: a concern

• RE: The Tepenecz signature in book no. 4: a concern

  ReneZ > 01-06-2019, 05:29 PM

  JKP,
  
  what you write is clearly correct. Unfortunately, it isn't really possible to see how this à looks on the Voynich MS.
  I could easily imagine that the "a" is written differently when it just follows another letter (the capital J in Jacobi) or when it is the start of a word.
  
  When Voynich sent a picture of the signature to the Prague archives in 1921, it was also not clear, and the answer suggested that the writing was: "Jacobj ð Tepenecz". (Hope that curved d with a stroke through it comes through).
  
  In any case, the example of the Voynich MS is the only one we have that is on parchment, and I can imagine that this also makes a difference.

• RE: The Tepenecz signature in book no. 4: a concern

  -JKP- > 01-06-2019, 09:20 PM

  I can see why someone might read that middle letter on the VMS as ð. Besides the signature not being very clear, it's a very common abbreviation for "de" (and occasionally other short d-words) in medieval script. It is frequently written as "d" with a tickmark to the right side of the ascender (when written as a ligature, the "e" is nothing more than a brief stroke and almost disappears).
  
  
  As for the à on the Dialecta Aristotelis book, it's quite a different shape and out of character with the other Jacobi "a" shapes, even for a letter written by itself. I'm not suggesting any conclusions about this, only pointing it out. You can't really tell much from one occurrence.
• Next Oldest Next Newest