- Options
- Login
- Desktop Style
Options
qo and the 15.5% factor
- qo and the 15.5% factor
-
qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 03-10-2020, 02:35 AM
How rare or not is it for a text of about 34,000 vords or words to have a prefix like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. which is present for about 15.5% of a corpus?If any of our researchers were able to scan several different languages like Latin, German, English and lastly Italian would it be common to find a prefix which stands out with such a large foot print in a text like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.? To be fair if one were to study the statistics for the other various languages they should use only 34,000 words from that text for each language.I know I'm being a bit bias for the language assumptions to test against, however the VMS was found in Italy so I presume if its not gibberish or it is gibberish in the Zipf presentation of my other thread that it is most likely Latin. However, that being said, if the Author just invented vords and attached them to Latin words maybe the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. phenomenon is of that reason.Yet if we do a study and this is common then we all learn that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is fine.Here I am asking again for anyone who has knowledge regarding about how to return or print just the first two characters from words of a text file via python and get a count for those token pairs. As I would like to test this myself, although I'm just a beginner in python, I don't know how to write the code. -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
MarcoP > 03-10-2020, 07:14 AM
Hi Voynichgibberish,
the script you want is perfect for a beginner python developer. I encourage you to write it yourself.
The behaviour of qo is a special case of a wider subject known as "character entropy".
Most of what you posted on the forum (Zipf's law, the "gibberish" idea, character entropy) is discussed by Bowern and Lindemann in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. You should definitely read it with care. Their references will give you further information about the main topics, if needed. -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 03-10-2020, 08:01 PM
These bigrams were stripped from Genesis and 2 Samuel of the Latin Vulgate Bible. These are all the first two characters from the words within these texts for a total of 34049.
"et" was the highest stripped bigram return with 2586 for about 7.5% of the text.
I will look at English, German and Italian to see if You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is an anomaly. I believe You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. was used to shorten Latin words during the copy process, meaning[font=Eva] You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. [/font][/font]really shortens the length for what was 4 tokens. I simply believe the Author of the VMS found a lazy way to not right out all text and to hide Latin as the language. If I'm correct and I find You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. to be an anomaly against other texts and it is substantial like it is with Latin then to me this would point to the VMS being a gibberish text.
Here is the code to find bigrams or the first two characters from words:
Code:# dictionary to store count of each word (2 characters) eg. "an": 2
wordDict = {}
file = open("C:\python37\Genesis2SamLatinV.txt", 'r')
# read each line in file
for line in file:
# read each word in line
for word in line.split():
# get only first two letters of word
word = word[:2]
# If word is not in dictionary then add it
if word not in wordDict:
wordDict[word] = 1
# else increment the count
else:
wordDict[word] += 1
file.close()
# print all values
for key, val in wordDict.items():
print(key, val)
# print total
print(f"Total: {sum(wordDict.values())}")
Code:in 1481
pr 469
cr 48
De 247
ca 240
et 2586
te 629
au 419
er 334
va 88
su 1020
fa 276
ab 128
sp 42
fe 155
aq 61
di 728
fi 596
lu 31
es 685
vi 513
qu 1487
bo 43
ac 109
ap 91
no 600
ve 504
ma 365
un 191
me 601
hi 65
it 104
vo 242
se 639
co 578
lo 176
ar 125
ai 149
ge 176
he 33
li 78
po 427
fr 214
iu 134
cu 514
ip 91
si 345
ad 811
ha 273
ut 297
an 290
du 163
mi 326
st 86
ea 130
re 687
ce 82
gr 82
om 293
at 64
mo 184
be 127
ei 414
mu 148
av 10
ho 139
im 40
pi 26
il 285
eo 242
do 339
ec 59
de 548
ig 80
pe 326
or 53
op 59
pa 436
sa 104
is 73
Do 257
ag 60
en 101
pl 71
fo 104
as 84
e 11
a 82
hu 39
pu 140
sc 71
fl 45
eg 170
Ph 71
ci 120
Ev 6
ub 29
na 62
ib 67
bd 1
la 63
on 5
Ge 43
Ae 87
Ti 3
As 29
Eu 3
tu 558
eu 219
ex 192
ne 160
so 127
Ad 54
ob 78
ae 47
nu 172
os 37
ux 129
ta 76
oc 108
am 54
ti 134
ni 46
tr 157
vu 16
Ha 21
em 33
ch 5
gl 20
Ca 33
ru 32
Ab 278
fu 147
ov 44
of 9
ir 22
cl 35
da 56
Ed 12
En 15
Ir 3
Ma 59
La 42
al 104
Se 72
Ia 133
Iu 46
Th 52
No 34
ul 25
el 17
gi 1
us 59
le 36
bi 37
to 52
Ar 28
ia 26
ra 5
ol 7
ed 23
od 16
ef 15
Ch 74
um 4
ev 10
Go 11
Mo 8
Ri 1
El 11
Ce 12
Me 30
Fu 1
Sa 141
He 76
Re 36
Da 218
Ne 15
ro 11
Ba 43
Ni 2
Lu 5
An 14
Si 25
Et 5
Ie 22
Am 61
Ga 22
So 33
Le 8
Eb 8
Us 2
Hu 6
Fa 6
Uz 1
Op 3
Io 176
id 33
Na 39
Lo 34
Ur 26
iv 5
Sy 56
In 2
Be 65
Ai 2
ri 13
Fe 5
ie 11
Po 2
Ra 45
Zu 1
Em 9
Es 65
Ho 6
Ci 1
Ag 10
Su 7
Is 174
Tu 1
Vi 4
bu 8
ur 31
az 1
Fi 3
Pa 4
Bu 1
Az 1
Ro 8
Ta 2
Ep 26
hy 9
Za 10
Du 1
It 1
gn 1
io 1
Oc 1
Li 22
Ze 7
eb 2
Ru 12
Di 12
gy 3
ga 3
ty 3
Te 3
ba 5
Fo 2
bl 3
Fl 2
Ef 2
Gr 1
Oo 7
Hi 44
Co 4
Om 3
Al 2
On 5
Ah 12
Ac 5
Bo 1
Mi 18
Id 3
Pu 5
Od 2
th 8
gu 2
uv 4
ep 4
sq 1
by 1
Eh 1
Gu 1
eq 7
o 2
br 2
At 1
Pl 1
Aq 2
Ty 1
Ib 1
Oz 5
ly 1
cy 1
Pe 1
Ob 5
Gi 2
Ol 1
Total: 34049 -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 04-10-2020, 12:55 AM
Everyone I'm sorry if this info is lame and I believe I'm making too many assumptions about a text that is mission impossible. What if's and I believe and It could be are statements that need facts behind them and that's what I'm trying to do. I'm probably not the only one who has gone down the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.hole before.
Now prepare for this assumption before we look at German and Italian, could You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. be "th"? Has anyone ever stated this before? Is this an assumption until I look at the other two languages, probably? If I'm right about "th", does this imply the VMS is not gibberish and in Middle English? Was the Voynich Manuscript made by a doctor during the Medieval ages? These are assumptions, with a little stat though.
I have to say I feel like a fool for I found that "th" in the WyCliffe Bible for Jeremiah represented 5,740 as number with a text size of 34,054 and that was 16.8%! What does this tell us all? I'm wrong about You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[font=Eva] [/font]as being an anomaly or a two token that shorten vords that were 4 tokens.
I have to say if one wants to look at the first two characters of all the Voynich Glyphs you have to remember some glyphs are represented by two English letters.
So for comparison of languages please only target the VMS glyphs that only have a one to one relationship with Glyph to English letters.
Here is a distribution for the first two characters and sorry some single characters are in there for the Voynich!
Distinct Vords total 6818
Remember these are distinct vords so some vords have been used more than once so the count will only show that. If I could use 34,000 vords than the counts would be higher, but obtaining that is what I don't have.
Code:a 1
ac 3
ad 6
ae 4
ag 1
ai 58
ak 10
al 85
am 8
an 1
ao 1
ap 2
ar 46
as 3
at 5
ax 1
ay 1
c 1
cc 2
cf 18
ch 932
ck 51
co 2
cp 55
cs 18
ct 84
cy 1
d 1
da 168
dc 88
dd 5
de 29
df 1
dg 1
di 4
dk 16
dl 15
dm 1
do 85
dp 3
dr 2
ds 37
dt 6
dx 1
dy 34
e 1
ea 4
ec 6
ee 31
ef 1
ek 12
el 1
eo 5
ep 5
er 1
es 4
et 17
ey 1
f 1
fa 5
fc 35
fd 2
fe 2
fo 15
fs 8
fy 2
g 1
ga 2
ge 1
gm 1
h 1
ha 1
ho 3
hr 1
hx 1
hy 1
ih 1
ii 3
ik 2
in 1
ip 1
it 3
k 1
ka 36
kc 57
kd 1
ke 79
kh 3
kl 1
ko 54
ks 27
ky 4
l 1
la 8
lc 56
ld 11
le 5
lf 8
lg 2
li 1
lk 90
ll 9
lm 1
lo 51
lp 10
lr 5
ls 37
lt 18
lx 1
ly 1
m 1
ma 1
mo 1
n 1
o 1
oa 18
oc 85
od 51
oe 75
of 51
og 2
oh 2
oi 17
ok 330
ol 259
om 2
oo 6
op 130
oq 12
or 72
os 31
ot 377
ox 4
oy 15
p 1
pa 18
pc 86
pd 8
pe 1
po 84
ps 25
py 13
q 1
qa 3
qc 18
qe 44
qf 1
qk 11
ql 1
qo 638
qp 1
qs 2
qt 2
qy 5
r 1
ra 26
rc 23
rd 1
re 2
rf 1
rk 6
rl 2
rn 1
ro 30
rp 1
rs 8
rt 1
ry 2
s 1
sa 60
sc 37
sd 1
se 15
sf 1
sh 452
si 1
sk 8
sl 1
so 107
sp 2
sq 1
ss 10
sy 11
t 1
ta 35
tc 69
td 4
te 59
th 1
tl 1
to 77
ts 41
ty 4
v 1
vo 1
x 1
xa 1
xo 3
y 1
ya 7
yc 79
yd 20
ye 7
yf 16
yh 1
yi 1
yk 160
yl 12
yo 22
yp 41
yq 2
yr 6
ys 42
yt 123
yy 1
Total: 6818 -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
aStobbart > 04-10-2020, 03:43 PM
Just realized that there is not a single instance of 4o in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The first one appears in f1v. Has anyone else noticed this before? If it stants for "th" and the language is medieval english what are the odds it will be missing from an entire page ? -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
DONJCH > 04-10-2020, 05:04 PM
(never mind) -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 05-10-2020, 12:02 AM
I just remembered if anyone wants me to post all the returned two characters for Jeremiah from the WyCliffe Bible just reply with the request.
I just finished the stats for looking only at the first two characters of every word for about 34,000 words from Dante's Inferno.
"ch" topped the list at 1,813 for a text of 34,093 words and that statistic is 5.3% of those words. Now I have to find a German text with about 34k of words.
"th" is looking like a strong candidate for You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. !
Code:Ne 17
me 385
de 547
ca 280
di 1303
no 737
vi 405
mi 590
ri 361
pe 793
un 211
se 586
os 9
ch 1813
la 1347
er 117
sm 14
Ah 12
qu 880
a 672
ec 31
du 215
es 98
e 1321
as 62
fo 258
ne 340
pa 435
Ta 19
po 408
ep 8
ma 554
tr 249
be 133
co 1297
vh 3
sc 209
Io 56
so 463
ta 218
pi 463
pu 148
ve 480
ab 16
Ma 113
fu 318
al 399
gi 320
te 285
va 133
il 211
gu 94
in 526
le 487
su 428
sp 161
ra 98
dr 29
og 33
Al 48
E 168
af 15
us 38
si 728
vo 304
re 126
lo 471
Po 68
l 420
Ed 39
pr 257
mo 340
an 190
mp 11
Te 19
da 314
n 40
st 195
lu 303
fi 196
ga 20
do 212
Qu 143
fa 350
tu 477
br 63
ge 93
fe 182
gr 201
eq 17
ac 54
sa 387
nc 6
Me 15
ro 53
ba 80
li 388
oc 57
of 16
Mi 17
od 16
om 31
ce 109
Ri 14
No 62
am 46
Na 7
Iu 3
Ro 14
bu 56
Au 3
dA 19
Tr 23
Il 2
Or 37
Vi 18
fr 87
O 48
on 71
mh 11
Tu 32
au 5
cu 90
io 146
to 140
Ve 33
ai 9
i 123
A 16
vu 26
ha 65
na 69
em 13
Mo 14
ci 260
Di 73
um 12
It 2
Ca 85
Eu 3
Ni 5
nf 17
nv 12
On 14
et 33
ov 38
ud 24
ti 127
im 31
In 57
el 81
oh 4
iv 4
Pi 28
II 3
Lo 45
mu 48
o 62
or 92
Si 35
ad 65
Pe 62
ef 3
u 3
An 21
Va 11
En 2
Pa 21
cr 109
Se 48
ho 12
ed 52
Da 22
nt 23
Lu 19
ei 22
I 30
Be 17
ar 59
en 21
Do 13
eg 5
- 12
bi 30
ni 15
Ra 5
lh 7
Du 5
mb 3
ap 50
Oh 17
Co 92
Gi 28
La 63
th 2
gl 13
av 124
Fa 17
sd 5
ns 5
ig 5
El 20
ol 8
Le 17
Gu 16
is 12
go 30
nu 43
uo 9
Fi 19
IV 1
Ru 7
Os 2
eb 23
Gr 6
ub 1
Ab 1
Is 4
eO 3
Ov 3
Ge 8
Et 2
Ce 16
Br 15
Sa 25
So 15
Pl 2
nn 3
De 16
Em 1
Er 4
Ze 1
Li 19
To 13
Ip 1
Av 5
Ga 10
V 1
St 7
ru 29
ae 2
eC 3
Ac 8
Am 4
at 30
Ch 28
Fr 8
bo 53
VI 3
Ur 1
ag 18
Vo 7
Ci 12
Ia 4
Ar 9
ng 6
Ei 2
As 5
zu 4
eo 2
Su 7
sn 2
Fl 6
sb 5
Om 10
Us 2
Ud 1
IX 1
At 6
Pu 11
id 2
eA 3
Go 6
Gl 1
X 1
Ep 1
Bu 5
lA 9
ev 6
Fe 7
Ap 3
XI 6
Fo 11
ip 1
ir 13
Cr 11
sl 1
eN 2
eF 1
sv 3
nd 2
Es 1
fl 2
Pr 9
Uo 1
Un 8
Ba 8
dI 2
Vu 2
Re 2
XV 4
ie 1
eT 1
gh 8
Bo 8
it 2
Ec 5
az 2
sg 8
mm 1
Ic 1
uc 3
sf 3
Gh 1
eI 1
Iv 3
Ho 1
Fu 3
za 6
op 5
XX 16
Dr 3
Ti 5
Sc 8
Zi 1
eu 1
Ie 3
Za 2
Od 1
Ir 1
Cl 1
ia 1
lE 2
ee 2
Bi 3
sq 4
dE 2
Og 3
ib 1
ur 1
Ul 1
Sp 4
ah 2
ot 1
eM 1
ob 2
Cu 1
Eg 1
ul 2
eG 2
Ad 3
eR 1
pl 2
ze 1
Ug 3
Mu 3
sh 1
eB 1
ea 1
e- 1
PU 1
Ut 1
ex 1
Ae 1
D 1
L 1
DI 1
IU 2
QU 1
TE 1
lI 2
Total: 34093 -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 05-10-2020, 01:15 AM
Here are the statistics from the Luther German Bible for Genesis.
"un" don't forget to add in "Un" has a value of 2,862 for 8.4% of 33,812 words was in the Luther German Bible and stood out as the highest two character return from all those words.
So what's the take away from these four languages that are often looked at when compared to the Voynich Manuscript. If I had to study one language on a hunch and this is all the information I had than I would choose Middle English, because "th" does stand out and compares to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and fits nicely. Yet what if You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is a null? Does the Voynich Manuscript point to its being enciphered because "o" is the most used glyph so if it is "h" in Middle English. The Voynich Manuscript should be a substitution cipher, but what type would it be? Is it a polyalphabetic like an Alberti Cipher or just a Monoalphabetic Substitution Cipher. At any rate could one of the most used vords like "oe" translate to "he"? I guess my handle seems a little silly now, maybe not
On a deeper note without a cipher yet and further study I just looked up a Middle English word for "otol", which is a label for a star, empty pipe, and a leaf. If you follow the rule than hihe could work for "otol" and here is its You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.:
Code:Am 28
An 52
sc 139
Go 249
Hi 64
un 2332
Er 231
Un 530
di 1014
wa 487
wà 40
le 104
es 149
fi 38
au 577
de 1840
Ti 26
Ge 241
Wa 109
sp 478
Es 146
we 219
Li 25
sa 170
da 1069
gu 22
Da 405
vo 496
Fi 11
na 214
Ta 92
Na 88
Ab 288
Mo 50
er 624
ei 485
Fe 84
zw 97
se 897
ma 132
ü 107
ge 783
al 395
an 319
si 903
be 283
Ö 5
Tr 47
Sa 148
Me 107
la 83
Gr 29
Kr 19
fr 53
BÃ 33
je 55
Ar 38
Fr 53
tr 89
ha 499
li 92
ih 838
dr 56
Ze 66
Ja 307
gr 66
re 104
kl 11
St 145
vi 59
mi 597
fl 21
Se 115
me 348
eu 158
im 109
fà 104
Di 118
br 47
he 179
Vi 52
La 253
Bi 20
gl 14
VÃ 42
ga 101
kr 10
zu 647
Ma 162
We 257
ic 349
Sp 38
Al 148
He 205
am 36
ru 10
is 214
HE 165
no 49
ni 302
ke 41
ba 28
Ne 11
gi 80
fe 22
bl 36
Od 3
in 315
pf 7
Ga 28
Ed 21
hi 233
lu 7
Ba 37
Le 119
Gu 15
te 14
Ha 260
Pi 2
um 94
kà 32
Be 112
On 10
Gi 15
As 16
Eu 5
Du 25
so 328
ab 224
du 277
ià 4
wi 496
To 69
st 127
De 105
sà 12
ne 59
Vo 58
ti 2
Sc 133
fa 28
Ri 24
Fl 31
do 43
MÃ 43
Va 187
Mu 32
ve 141
Ih 14
Wi 57
EÃ 1
rà 9
eà 2
Au 52
bà 16
aà 15
wu 44
hà 55
Ad 25
ri 36
Wo 48
bi 151
Ic 81
Ko 16
ze 92
Ki 150
Ve 14
Ac 31
Ku 11
nà 10
Do 7
Im 2
Br 231
Ev 2
RÃ 2
Si 169
Nu 10
ew 10
Ch 13
Ka 135
fu 10
fo 13
et 4
Op 4
gn 3
Is 144
SÃ 84
TÃ 73
to 5
HÃ 87
Bl 16
nu 109
em 6
mà 39
mu 12
So 216
wo 146
No 33
Ir 4
Zi 28
zo 73
Ju 34
Pf 8
Th 33
Ei 23
Re 76
Wu 2
JÃ 13
En 27
Zu 5
pr 9
Bu 32
hu 21
ä 14
ac 11
Ke 24
gà 7
Ty 1
Bo 15
Gn 19
oh 7
Pe 7
Dr 4
El 29
LÃ 19
ob 34
Mi 46
ko 81
tu 41
Pa 8
ta 40
NÃ 2
ka 122
pa 2
In 4
Eb 8
ho 27
FÃ 74
Ra 58
Fu 14
op 5
ro 5
Kl 23
jà 20
Kn 115
Pu 1
Ni 10
Ak 2
Lu 6
Ph 96
Je 13
Ä 108
Uz 3
Hu 16
Jo 147
Us 1
Ob 4
eb 4
Tu 8
Lo 50
Ur 4
Ji 4
zà 12
Ai 2
Te 21
pl 5
Pl 1
zi 39
Or 23
Za 3
of 7
od 19
eh 14
Zo 14
KÃ 68
Su 11
Em 1
Ho 15
WÃ 11
en 23
ja 8
Pr 8
GÃ 16
Fa 4
ju 4
Aa 1
ra 5
Of 2
Zw 5
kn 2
za 5
Um 1
tà 11
ZÃ 2
mo 3
bu 12
ir 3
là 7
Eh 5
Oh 11
su 6
Uf 3
Sy 6
Ep 28
qu 3
go 6
Oc 3
lo 2
-K 1
Ü 6
Ah 1
Ru 14
el 2
Pn 2
Fo 1
Om 2
Ez 4
Aj 1
Qu 2
Aw 1
Ro 9
My 2
Po 5
Gl 3
dà 7
Os 1
ku 1
và 1
ed 1
Ot 1
At 2
Total: 33812 -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
MichelleL11 > 05-10-2020, 01:25 AM
(04-10-2020, 03:43 PM)aStobbart Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Just realized that there is not a single instance of 4o in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The first one appears in f1v. Has anyone else noticed this before? If it stants for "th" and the language is medieval english what are the odds it will be missing from an entire page ?
If the VM plaintext had the same frequency as the Wycliffe Bible, about 16.8% of all word starts are “th,” based on Voynichgibberish’s data.
If words in the VM are actual words in the plaintext, for f1r, which has 210 words (according to the Takahashi translation), on average (if the words, with the same frequency starts as the Wycliffe Bible were randomly placed) you would expect about 35 words in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. to start with “th” (e.g. start with qo).
I think the problem with figuring the "odds" of this happening relies on the "qo" words being evenly distributed.
A quick look on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (qo search, then hit the two lines button to show the histograms) reveals that does not seem to be the case. About 20% are in Currier A and about 80% are in Currier B. There is a moderate, constant use in the “herbal” texts, little to no use in the “astrology” and “zodiac-like pages” and then extremely high use in the remaining sections of the manuscript.
This could be argued to be underlying language related, related to whatever differentiates Currier A from Currier B if that is different than an underlying language, or perhaps, but less convincingly in my mind (assuming a constant language), subject matter related. I find this less convincing because I don’t know of any reason why the “th” sound would not start words related to certain subjects, unless perhaps the subject was dominated by loan words that do not use that sound at the beginning of words. Which could be the case . . . .
But it should be noted that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is not unique in its complete lack of qo words. There are a total of six folios that have no qo words on them (f1r (210 words), You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (plant with only 3 words), You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (101 words), f72v1 (102 words), f72v3 (121 words) (f72v for link), and f72r3 (169 words) (f72r for link).
Admittedly, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. does have the most text of all of these, although its topic is usually surmised to be some sort of intro page – so the fact that some “introduced” topics somehow avoid the use of qo in such a summary, but use it to such extent in the actual pages, does seem a bit suspicious.
I realize this discussion can provide no conclusion. But, like a lot of the VM questions -- the answer seems to be maybe. -
RE: qo and the 15.5% factor
Voynichgibberish > 05-10-2020, 01:49 AM
Dear MichelleL11,
Quote:If the VM plaintext had the same frequency as the Wycliffe Bible, about 16.8% of all word starts are “th,” based on Voynichgibberish’s data.
I decided to post the text of Wycliffe Bible for Jeremiah of only 34,054 words. So "th" and remember to add "Th" was 5,740 for 16.8% of the text.
MichelleL11,
The Voynich Manuscript contains between 34k-35k vords.
Jeremiah WyCliffe Bible:
Code:JE 1
Th 255
wo 333
of 1468
Je 140
so 292
Hi 6
th 5485
pr 230
we 206
in 837
An 309
la 218
Be 34
on 230
wh 499
Fo 108
Lo 635
wa 278
ma 384
to 933
hi 321
da 144
Jo 19
Am 6
ki 114
Ju 121
ye 394
re 117
it 230
do 247
un 84
en 79
el 11
Ze 8
ti 71
pa 51
ov 25
ei 30
ta 84
ca 177
fi 126
mo 111
or 165
ex 3
pe 256
me 404
an 2009
sa 598
I 725
fo 605
kn 82
be 652
ou 185
ha 411
ga 95
a 446
am 69
co 217
de 275
na 88
A! 7
Go 116
lo 120
sp 110
ch 68
O! 7
bu 172
Do 21
no 755
sh 1203
go 218
al 300
se 223
Dr 3
fa 191
wi 344
Fe 1
ke 11
fe 51
my 300
gi 77
pu 36
dr 92
up 91
sc 26
pl 106
Wh 103
ro 37
br 119
tr 143
po 51
bo 74
fr 258
is 308
Fr 5
ev 123
dw 49
ea 169
ci 88
ag 121
ar 57
He 34
li 219
J 36
E 72
R 36
M 36
A 55
H 36
te 47
ju 45
st 213
ow 28
ri 37
af 59
ir 12
pi 19
le 130
cr 39
mi 68
yo 242
es 7
at 38
Is 92
ho 196
gr 65
si 87
Ja 8
he 469
aw 105
va 28
di 120
em 6
fu 47
us 64
Eg 20
by 130
im 5
ne 93
as 128
Ca 8
ab 65
Pr 3
Ba 50
id 13
La 6
Ch 9
Ke 3
if 65
su 38
ce 14
gl 28
Ye 20
tw 7
qu 15
du 8
sl 31
Li 12
vo 66
tu 77
Al 17
Me 3
Ta 4
As 23
fl 42
ba 35
Si 5
Ni 1
Ri 17
Eu 9
bl 21
bi 31
vi 51
cl 27
Ev 4
mu 16
Ho 30
Se 4
sw 71
ru 6
ac 12
lu 3
nu 8
Le 12
O 15
In 9
sm 12
ge 7
We 20
Bu 35
ve 55
It 5
If 9
hu 39
Ra 7
ey 36
ra 39
Na 1
gu 12
wr 28
ad 31
Sh 24
Ki 7
Ha 5
Tu 3
Re 1
My 7
Ne 14
ob 15
Zi 16
Co 7
Mo 4
Ar 1
At 4
Fa 2
Ve 3
Tr 4
Ma 9
Pe 9
Te 9
On 5
Da 17
Ep 2
So 11
sk 4
cu 14
Ea 13
oi 2
Wo 14
ap 4
ol 5
op 16
Yo 2
sn 6
jo 14
ni 10
Cu 10
To 18
Po 4
ot 11
av 5
St 4
Cl 1
Va 6
Sl 2
ai 10
Wi 2
Gn 1
gn 1
od 2
Gi 8
ph 1
ja 8
Sp 1
Ed 2
ax 1
Id 1
Up 2
Op 1
Pl 1
oa 1
Cr 2
Sw 2
De 2
Ga 3
Mi 3
dy 2
Sa 6
Et 2
Gr 1
Ou 2
No 3
En 1
yi 5
Bl 1
Su 1
Pa 11
Im 2
Pu 2
Wr 2
Gu 1
Fi 2
Total: 34054