Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving?
#11
(27-12-2022, 10:20 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These two marks tend to align most with the pharmaceutical text (yellow crosses) [...]

Hi Rene,
unless I messed up something in the top plot You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., the bigram that makes f58 different from pharma is 'eo'. That bigram is typical of pharmacese, where it is three times more frequent than in f58 (~6% vs ~2%).
[+] 1 user says Thank You to MarcoP for this post
Reply
#12
Register or login to view the content
[+] 2 users say Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply
#13
Register or login to view the content
[+] 2 users say Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply
#14
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#15
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Independent Analysis Identifying Languages Beyond Currier A/ B, compared to René Zand npcompl33t 18 2,950 12-10-2026, 04:10 PM
Last Post: npcompl33t
  "The Currier languages revisited" revisited kckluge 72 29,400 19-02-2026, 02:11 PM
Last Post: kckluge
  Extension to the Currier languages ReneZ 19 16,467 15-05-2024, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Juan_Sali
  Time to retire Currier languages? Emma May Smith 42 38,872 20-08-2021, 12:38 AM
Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com
  Implications of the continuity of Currier "languages" MarcoP 21 27,796 31-12-2018, 05:13 PM
Last Post: nickpelling
  Scribal hands and Currier languages Koen G 15 19,283 16-02-2017, 10:33 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)