MarcoP > 07-04-2016, 09:08 AM
Diane > 28-05-2016, 03:08 PM
Davidsch > 31-05-2016, 11:46 AM
Helmut Winkler > 31-05-2016, 03:33 PM
(31-05-2016, 11:46 AM)Davidsch Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.hmmm. i am sorry to ask here, but i need to know if anyone also have matches for angelica, angelicus ?
I stumbled upon a possible translation yesterday in the VMS, but the drawing of that herb does not resemble the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.at all.
Davidsch > 31-05-2016, 10:40 PM
-JKP- > 01-06-2016, 03:41 AM
(31-05-2016, 10:40 PM)Davidsch Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.here is that manuscript: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
i can not find your reference, can you see it?
That site has a nice search function, so i searched, and this is a match:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
...
Helmut Winkler > 01-06-2016, 07:47 AM
-JKP- > 01-06-2016, 08:14 AM
Koen G > 01-06-2016, 08:44 AM
-JKP- > 01-06-2016, 10:14 AM
(01-06-2016, 08:44 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This seems like a very romantic way of saying 'they sang folk songs which contained a fair amount of melodic nonsense words, onomatopoeia and archaic vocabulary'. Like many European folk songs tend to do. My daughter learns ancient ditties in language no longer understood in daycare.
Of course the origin of folk songs can be interesting, especially if those songs relate to traditions and festivals. But the presence of unintellegible language need not imply anything out of the ordinary.