24-08-2025, 05:26 PM
(24-08-2025, 03:44 PM)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.His folio 1r text is still made up but as imaginary Voynichese goes, it's a step up from the first effort.
Let's leave this guy be, everyone, while a decision is taken as to whether to move it to GPT Prison.
I read what he wrote 3 times still couldn’t understand to full extent maybe my english is lacking. Anyways he changed his proposed author(s) and now the proposed author was dead a century ago before the cows of the vellum were slaughtered. He is still saying that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is about cornflower which can simple not be true.
What really gets me is the claims of indentations for the missing pages. To make this claim; one simply must have access to the original manuscript and even probably micro CT scans of the pages. Such indentations won’t be visible in scanned manuscript nor the multispectral images. Also one has to have an idea how vellum was scribbled. This person probably thinks that the book was binded as a notebook would be and scribes wrote on the pages. This is not the case, vellum parchments were individually written before the binding of the book thus any claims of indentation can be dismissed. Also vellum is thick enough and does not act as paper does. Anyways lets leave him be as you said Tavie.
