-JKP-
You speak for me here...
Quote:I wanted to learn the VMS iconography first and then look at individual plant IDs and there are many completely accurate naturalistic plants in the manuscript, regardless of what people say. Even the ones that are somewhat stylized do it in a rational and mostly consistent way.
Koen,
I think - and I've said, actually - that the emblems of Sukkot are one reading for the figure which some describe as holding a snowball etc.
As I see it, too, we have a
non-standard form for the lulav in the botanical section - fol. 19r. That is, the formation of the base agrees with imagery from c.1stC AD, and the other elements agree, but where one would expect the citron one has a flower like the 'peacock' flower. I posited (given that a majority of the plants are not found in the Mediterranean, where citrus medicus is, that this was another, or older, custom in regions where c.medicus was unavailable. These days, with planes and refrigeration, it's not a problem.
As it happens, I've just got hold of an article which speaks of various alternatives to c.medicus that are known to have been used. They include, interestingly, the Buddha hand citron.
As to beaks for a Jews' nose. As far as I know that was primarily a German habit, though I haven't made a study of it. The famous Haggadah also shows that Jews themselves might avoid representing the human face by showing bird-heads. Not a common habit. In France and England especially, the image of an owl with human expressions, or performing human actions, was meant to be read as a reference to Jews. Not for nice reasons, of course.