-Job- > 01-02-2016, 09:10 AM
(20-08-2015, 08:28 AM)david Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quote:Is not the repetition issue too exaggerated?
I think the issue is not direct repetition, but rather many similar words repeated, as in Timms pairs and [ah-hem] Jackson sequences, which are not features of written languages.
Quote:God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw the light, and saw that it was good. God divided the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day”, and the darkness he called “night”
davidjackson > 03-02-2016, 05:55 PM
Torsten > 04-02-2016, 09:38 AM
crezac > 04-02-2016, 11:56 AM
Torsten > 04-02-2016, 12:32 PM
-Job- > 05-02-2016, 11:13 AM
ReneZ > 05-02-2016, 11:54 AM
Torsten > 05-02-2016, 12:19 PM
Emma May Smith > 06-02-2016, 09:00 PM
(05-02-2016, 12:19 PM)Torsten Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@JobHi Torsten, I read your paper soon after it came out, but have only just published You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. It is not the whole of my objections, but a key one.
I have published the auto copying hypothesis in 2014 (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
So far, three responses were published: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
Two are in favour of my hypothesis and Gordon Rugg only says that he is not convinced.
In summary I would say there are no published arguments against my hypothesis.
Torsten > 07-02-2016, 02:59 AM