+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html)
+--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
RE: It is not Chinese - countingtls - 25-06-2025
(18-06-2025, 07:55 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Here are the lines of the Starred Parags section (SPS; from page 105r to page 116r line 30) that I am currrently considering to be "titles":
<f105r.T1.9a>
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=10835]](https://www.voynich.ninja/attachment.php?aid=10835)
This is very interesting, consider the formatting and fonts are key structure and features in denoting subsections and types of materials, often placed not in the front, but as footnote-like at the end of a list of entries. They might be intentional, instead of errors or transcription quirks. They are supposedly to be there, just poorly formatted from someone who saw a printed version.
RE: It is not Chinese - countingtls - 25-06-2025
RE: It is not Chinese - countingtls - 26-06-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - rikforto - 10-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - Jorge_Stolfi - 10-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - JoJo_Jost - 10-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - Jorge_Stolfi - 10-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - quimqu - 11-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - Jorge_Stolfi - 11-11-2025
RE: Opinions on: line as a functional unit - rikforto - 11-11-2025