![]() |
|
Voynich decoded completely - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: Voynich decoded completely (/thread-2416.html) |
RE: Voynich decoded completely - Helmut Winkler - 11-12-2023 @ Koen and who else may be interested You have to get rid of some of the axioms of V. research, mainly that the text is a ciphre and that it is an unknown script and accept it as a medieval ms., weitten in a medieval script and language. Then you can look around what it could be and the amount of medieval abbr.isĀ obvious.You then have the advantage of a readable text (you don't have to invent one) you can startĀ to interpret and translate it. Not that I would try to pretend I can read or understand everything. Just to give you a few examples: There is qo abbr. for quaestio, 9 for cum and an ending, ct for contra (which points to a Scholatic text), the dicit Avicenna (Canon) I mentioned before and dictum alberti (likely Magni, de vegetabilibus). There are more RE: Voynich decoded completely - Scarecrow - 11-12-2023 RE: Voynich decoded completely - nablator - 11-12-2023 RE: Voynich decoded completely - R. Sale - 11-12-2023 |